Sigma Announces the 16mm f/1.4 DN - Better Lenses for Sony a6300/a6500

Mixing a comfortable wide-angle design with an ultra-fast maximum aperture, this 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens from Sigma is a 24mm-equivalent prime for APS-C-format Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras like the a6300 and a6500. With a bright f/1.4 maximum aperture, this lens is well suited for low-light conditions and also affords increased control over depth of field. With a 9-bladed aperture design for smooth background blur. This lens also sports a stepping AF motor for quick, quiet, and smooth focusing performance that suits both still photography as well as video applications. Additionally, a weather-sealed, durable construction enables this 16mm f/1.4 to excel in inclement weather conditions.Suitable for the stars or landscape work as well as an excellent focal length for general walk around photography. Available in Sony and Micro 4/3 mounts.[gallery td_select_gallery_slide="slide" ids="16358,16359,16310"]

  • E-Mount Lens/APS-C Format
  • 24mm (35mm Equivalent)
  • Aperture Range: f/1.4 to f/16
  • 3 FLD, 2 SLD, and 2 Aspherical Elements
  • Super Multi-Layer Coating
  • Stepping AF Motor
  • Rounded 9-Blade Diaphragm
  • Weather-Sealed TSC Construction

Preorder Links at B&H Photo

Wide Angle Lenses for Real Estate Photography

Guest post from fantastic photographer and friend Steve Scurich

Shooting Real Estate with 24mm Tilt Shift, Canon 11-24 f/4 and Canon 16-35 F/4

So, I’ve recently rented a couple of lenses for some real estate photography jobs and wanted to share some of my thoughts…  To begin with, I am by no means an expert in equipment, settings or technical knowledge on this subject matter.  I am simply a guy who loves photography and makes a living photographing residential and commercial real estate, portraits and corporate events in the greater Santa Barbara, CA area.  Since that’s now out of the way, here are a few thoughts and example images.

"...as a Real Estate Photographer, I reject a lot of client's ideas about “removing” items from a scene, unless they are not permanent..."

For the past couple years, I’ve been using my Canon 24mm TS/E f3.5L lens on almost all my real estate photography assignments.  In fact, I’ve become so comfortable and happy with it, that I even use it on most landscape shoots when on a tripod.  It has awesome optics and I love how easy it is to compose my shots without much tripod adjustment.  I use the shift function all the time, and very minor tilt adjustments to simply straighten lines without losing too much focus above or below.  Also, it’s a fun lens to create the “miniature effect”, especially in large architectural spaces or urban landscapes….not for work, just play.  My work flow with this lens is usually like this: Choose an angle and set up my tripod fully extended (I use an Induro AT114 with RRS BH50 ball head), level the camera using the ball head bubble level, swivel camera to desired composition (this usually involves physically moving forward/backward slightly since the lens is a prime), shift TS/E up or down to frame composition, select focal spot and 10x zoom on Live View to manually focus, zoom out, select meter spot and take 5-7 exposures, usually -2, -1, 0, +1, +2.  Post production is usually a merge in LR with minor PS edits if needed.  It should be noted that as a Real Estate Photographer, I reject a lot of client's ideas about “removing” items from a scene, unless they are not permanent, to avoid any misrepresentation when marketing the property.  Selecting a good angle and processing a quality photograph is much more effective anyway.Having said all that, I can practically do this workflow in my sleep.  It’s what I know and I haven’t felt too pinched by a 24mm lens in most common area rooms.  Now that I live and work in Santa Barbara, CA however, a place where a 3bd/2ba 1300 sq ft home can easily sell for $1-10 Million depending on location;  I have found a need to use a super wide angle lens, especially in smaller bed/bathrooms.  I had been reading some great reviews on Canon’s new 11-24mm f/4L lens, so I rented it for a couple jobs.  First thing I’ll say is that it is HUGE, and heavy.  My gosh, what a beast-of-a-lens! That out of the way, it really is top quality and amazing.  Being a prime user primarily (see what I did there?), I constantly forgot to zoom in/out when using the 11-24mm….it was usually set around 11-13mm and I conducted business as usual (with the exception of TS/E).  If I had it permanently in my bag, the forgetting to zoom certainly wouldn’t have been an issue, but I’m not sure I truly utilized all it was capable of.  What I did notice though, is that I only selected about 50% of the angles I shot on the 11-24mm vs. my 24mm TS/E.  It has world class optics sure, and is totally impressive at the edges considering how wide it is, but it was extremely sensitive to angle distortion if my camera was not perfectly level on the tripod.  If too much ceiling was showing and I needed to “shift” down, the tripod adjustments started.  If too much floor showed and not enough ceiling, up went the center column, and so on.  Angling the lens up/down was just not a good option unless I wanted to spend hours in Manual Profile Lens Corrections - auto corrections are just okay for me.  In other words, it’s a finicky lens and needs to be treated with respect, patience and care (especially the very bulbous front glass).  Which brings me to another disappointment, lens filters.  I’m not sure what options are out there now for the 11-24mm, but I know my 82mm ND 9-stop filter certainly won’t work.  The lens hood is fixed in place and the lens cap covers both the lens and hood ends.  Did I mention it’s a beast-of-a-lens…?  In small spaces, with my tripod lowered to a height I found to be useful in most rooms, this lens was a dream.  Capturing a vast view from a patio, or framing up as much land around a property as possible, the 11-24mm is perfect.  Beyond that, I much prefer my 24mm TS/E.

My job is to entice a feeling of being able to visualize yourself living in a room, not to take your kids to the bending circus mirrors at a local carnival.

Another thing worth mentioning is that when I did use the 11-24mm in smaller spaces, it was a bit challenging framing up 3 walls vs. 2 as I usually do.  This could very well be due to my being a novice with super wide angle lenses, but I was just not happy with the distortion of angles on most shots.  All ceilings became “vaulted” and floors became sloped.  The images kind of screamed out, “Hey, the photographer obviously used a wide angle lens to try and make the room look bigger than it is!”  My job is to entice a feeling of being able to visualize yourself living in a room, not to take your kids to the bending circus mirrors at a local carnival.  Many of my 11mm shots were cropped down to 2 walls, probably about 16-20mm….and this brings me to my conclusion.If I had tons of money and could afford an array of pro lenses in my bag, I’d definitely buy the 11-24mm, no question.  My write up may seem a bit negative, but it’s an amazing lens and with more time and practice, I know I’d fall in love with it.  It is temperamental and requires a new way of composition framing, for me anyway, that can be really good down the road, but a headache when a client is moving from room-to-room, staying out of frame and waiting for me to finish photographing his/her property.  I am, however, not made of money so I need to consider my alternatives that can help in the small spaces or vast landscapes, and not cost more than an international photography safari with McKay Photography Academy - besides, I’d rather put my hard earned money there anyway…  So what do I do?  For me, it’s simple.  Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS.  I’ve played around with this lens recently and for a 1/3 of the cost of the 11-24mm, my wallet is wide open Canon.  Sure, the 11-24mm can possibly differentiate yourself from the competition as a professional real estate photographer, but let’s face it….if you’re splitting those hairs, you’re probably able to afford it.  The optics of the 16-35mm are great, it’s plenty wide enough for what I like to accomplish, it’s light and easy to carry, and my 77mm (or 82mm with step-down ring) filters fit right out the gates.  I’m still in a love affair with my 24mm TS/E, but for wider angle shots, I’m using the 16-35mm f/4L IS.Oh, I should probably mention that I’ve spent good time with Canon’s 17mm TS/E f/4L too, but with some of the problems I had with the 11-24mm (bulbous lens front, no filters, expense, etc.) while also being very disappointed in the clarity.  It’s getting a little long in the tooth, similar to the 17-40mm or 16-35 f/2.8 lenses.  The combination of my Canon 24mm TS/E f/3.5L and 16-35mm f/4L IS is just what the real estate photography doctor ordered.

Gear Mentioned

Canon 11-24 f/4 Lens- Buy from B&H Photo $2,999.00Canon 16-35 f/4 Lens- Buy from B&H Photo $999.00Canon 24mm f/3.5 TS/E - Buy from B&H Photo $1,899.00 (Watch a hands-on with Steve's tilt shift in Iceland)Canon’s 17mm f/4 TS/E - Buy from B&H Photo $2,189.00Induro Tripod - Buy from B&H Photo $129.00  Really Right Stuff Head $400.00

Lensbaby 8.5mm Circular Fisheye

Screenshot 2015-02-16 21.20.16Screenshot 2015-02-16 21.20.07Buy from Adorama | B&H Photo ($229.95 after instant $70 Savings)Lenses are manual focus and manual aperture. Manual Aperture is great for time lapse, less chance of flicker issues.Note: Compatible with Crop and Full frame cameras but will produce a circular image on BOTH types of camera. Example images shown below.Screenshot 2015-02-16 21.21.56 Alternative Option for budget Fisheye -

  • Rokinon 8mm f/3.5 HD Fisheye Lens - Buy from Adorama | B&H Photo ($239 to $259 depending on mount)
    • No circular image on crop sensor cameras
    • No interior metal for reflections like the lens baby
  • Opteka 6.5mm f/3.5 lens - Buy from Amazon ($179!)
    • No circular image on crop sensor cameras
    • No interior metal for reflections like the lens baby
    • Less fisheye more wide angle

Canon 10-18 vs Tokina 11-16 vs Canon 10-22

Battle of the WIDES! Canon 10-18 vs Tokina 11-16 vs Canon 10-22

Canon 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM

Pros of the 10-18

  • small, lightweight(weighs less than the kit lens) and cheap, $299!
  • Great quality- seriously impressed with how well it handles chromatic aberration (better than the others) and is sharp (though the differences between all is very slight)
  • Image stabilization for handholding seriously low shutter speeds
  • STM - absolutely smooth and silent video and full time manual focus* - half press of shutter required for manually turning the ring to have any effect.  If live view is on focus ring is always active.
  • Close focus abilities - almost macro like!

Cons of the 10-18

  • Slow (small maximum aperture) f/4.5 at 10mm and as soon as you zoom you hit f/5 and then f/5.6 shortly before 18mm
  • No distance indicator - very hard to manually focus in low light (bad for starry sky photos)

Tokia 11-16 f/2.8 DX II

Pros of the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 DX II

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Built like a tank and includes a lens hood
  • Distance indicator
  • Will mount on a full frame camera!

Cons of the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 DX II

  • Chromatic aberration very noticeable at wide apertures.
  • Vingetting also present at wide apertures - also present in other lenses but not quite to the same degree gone by f/5.6
  • I am not a fan of the big ring pull switch for AF/MF.
  • 77mm filter size - getting expensive

Canon 10-22 USM f/3.5-4.5

Pros of the Canon 10-22 USM

  • Big range for wide angle lens.
  • USM with full time manual focus
  • Distance indicator
  • Good build quality

Cons of the Canon 10-22 USM

  • What does it offer that the Canon and Tokina doesn’t?

Sigma 8-16 f/4.5-5.6 HSM (not reviewed in this video)

Pros

  • Extremely wide with 8mm
  • HSM for smooth and fast focus

Cons

  • Expensive
  • No filters - lens bulges like fisheye

Canon 10-18 Wide Angle Lens - Review

Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens review (Part I)

Part II will include comparisons vs Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 and Canon 10-22.Pros:Lightweight - 8.47 oz (240 g) & Compact (weighs just slightly more than the 18-55 and is shorter)Sharp with good colors, contrast and low to no Chromatic aberrationImage stabilization lets you shoot at SLOW shutter speeds (I handheld for 1 second with success)STM - smooth and silent autofocus during video with the Canon T4i, T5i and 70DCost -at $299 easy entry to exploring wide angle photographyCons:Widest aperture f/4.5 and you only have that at 10mm- Could be challenging in lower light and in situations where you want to isolate your subject/blur the background.Overall a great little lens and an excellent option for real estate, wide scenic landscapes and anyone that want's to explore wide angle photography. The 10-18 is $299 and shipping now from B&H. This is $300 cheaper than Canon's 10-22 f/3.5- f/4.5 and offers the same sharpness in a smaller and lighter package with Image Stabilization (IS) and Silent Stepper Motor (STM) for smooth and silent autofocus.  Image stabilization seems good- with static subjects you can go to very low shutter speeds due to the wide angle AND the inclusion of image stabilization.Canon's manual (download below) confirms that this is the smart IS built into the 10-18 and offers automatic recognition of when you are panning.Screenshot 2014-06-11 13.01.40 Screenshot 2014-06-11 13.01.31

Canon 10-18 review - Part II - Video Compare vs Tokina 11-16 and Canon 10-22

Additional suggested videos

 Download the Canon 10-18 Manual (PDF) My income depends on your purchases through my links- Buy the 10-18 from B&H 
Three image panorama using 10-18 at 10mm

Canon 10-18 Wide Angle Lens - Early Thoughts

I have had the Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens in my hand for 18 hours- I can say the following-It is sharp, light and affordable. A great option for real estate, landscapes and anyone that want's to explore wide angle photography. The 10-18 is $299 and shipping now from B&H. This is $300 cheaper than Canon's 10-22 f/2.5- f/4.5 and offers the same sharpness in a smaller and lighter package with Image Stabilization (IS) and Silent Stepper Motor (STM) for smooth and silent autofocus.  Image stabilization seems good- with static subjects you can go to very low shutter speeds due to the wide angle AND the inclusion of image stabilization. 10mm using the 10-1814mm using the 10-1818mm using the 10-1818mm using the 18-135 STMDownsides- Maximum aperture of f/4.5 at 10mm can be limiting - in both light and creative control. It is difficult to creatively blur the background when you are limited to a maximum of f/4.510mm at f/4.5 - focusing at the near focus limit gives you some background blur.A few more images -10mm18mm5103_10 mm1-40 sec at f - 4.5ISO 160I will have a video with some early thoughts up soon.